The late Ravi
Zacharias liked to tell the story of two brothers, known throughout their town
as crooked and ruthless in their business dealings. When one of them died, the
surviving brother sought out a minister who would be willing to say good things
about the dear departed at the
funeral. He told one pastor:
“I
will pay you a great sum…if in eulogizing my brother, you will refer to him as ‘a
saint.’”
This
minister was a man of principle, so he could not speak falsely for carnal gain;
but he also knew that he could do some good with the promised funds, so he
consented. With the sanctuary full of
those who had been swindled by the brothers and were hoping for some public
vindication, the pastor rose to speak:
“The
man you see in the coffin was a vile and debauched individual. He was a
liar, a thief, a deceiver, a manipulator, a reprobate, and a hedonist. He
destroyed the fortunes, careers, and lives of countless people in this city,
some of whom are here today. The man did every dirty, rotten,
unconscionable thing you can think of. But compared to his brother here, he was a saint.” [Can Man Live Without God?
pp.136-137, Word Publishing]
Something
tells me that the minister in that little anecdote never received a dime from
the surviving brother. Ravi's humorous story reminds us that men of principle
cannot always do what others desire or expect of them.
On one occasion,
Jesus was asked to pay the temple tax, an amount that each Jewish man was
expected to give to support the great Temple of Jerusalem. Here's the way the incident
is recounted by Matthew, who, you may recall, was himself a tax collector for
the Roman occupiers of Palestine before Jesus called him.
When they had come to Capernaum, those who
received the temple tax came to Peter and said, “Does your teacher not pay the
temple tax?” He said, “Yes.” And when he had come into the house, Jesus
anticipated him, saying, “What do you think, Simon? From whom do the
kings of the earth take customs or taxes, from their sons or from strangers?” Peter
said to Him, “From strangers.” Jesus said to him, “Then the sons are
free. [Matthew
17:24-26]
Jesus'
point was, since the temple was for the worship of God, our sovereign king, it
would not be appropriate to expect the Son of God---God in the flesh, to pay
such a tax.
But
because he had not yet revealed himself to all as God's Son (his time had not
yet come), it would have caused undue offense to those who were collecting the
temple tax for Jesus to refuse to pay it. This seems to be something of a
predicament. When viewed as a matter of principle, God's Son should
not have to pay such a tax, but when viewed as a matter of propriety,
he, an observant Jewish man, should fulfill all the requirements of the
law, and this one was spelled out in Exodus 30.
So
Jesus solved what we've called a predicament in a surprising way. He had a fish pay the tax for both Peter
and himself.
This
is quite amazing when you think about it. Peter was already convinced Jesus was
the Son of God (Matthew 16:16). But if any doubt had remained, this incident
could have removed it.
They were in
Capernaum, which was (and is) situated on the shore of the Sea of Galilee.
When Jesus told Peter to cast a hook into the sea, he was speaking of
that body of water, about thirteen miles long and eight miles wide at its
widest point.
Notice
that Jesus didn’t tell Peter where to cast his line. He didn’t
tell him whether to fish from shore or use a boat. He didn’t tell
him how deep to place his line, or what bait to use. But Jesus
had already determined that the first fish Peter caught would have a coin----not
in its stomach, but in its mouth. It’s not unheard of for
fishermen to discover coins and bottle caps and rings and indigestible bits of
plastic in the stomachs of fish, particularly now, as earth’s waterways
are filling up with our trash. But this fish, Jesus said, would have a
coin (a stater in the Greek---it may
have been about the size of a half dollar) in its mouth, a coin of sufficient
value to cover the temple tax for both of them.
We are not told
how the coin got there---dropped by a fisherman and mistaken for food by the
fish? Perhaps it was too large for the fish to swallow. Maybe it became
lodged in a gill. Not only did Jesus know there was a fish in the Sea of
Galilee with a coin in its mouth, he knew that when Peter cast a line into the
sea, that particular fish, of all the fish in that large body of water, would
strike the hook.
Furthermore, it's
evident that Jesus knew that Peter would be confronted about paying the Temple
Tax, and so in advance he preordained the conditions in which it could be paid
without violating the principle that a son ought not to be expected to pay a
tax to his own father.
It is one minor
incident, recorded for us, I believe, only in Matthew's gospel. But it reveals
a great deal, not only about the principles of Jesus of Nazareth, but about his
wisdom and power and sovereign control
over even minor events---the dropping of a coin, the movements of a fish
and the casting of a hook..
And if Christ's rule on earth extends
to the path of a coin and the course of a fish, then you and I can trust that
the events in our lives, even those that may seem minor, are not beyond his
control.
"Are not two sparrows sold for a
copper coin? And not one of them falls to the ground apart from your Father's
will...Do not fear, therefore, you are of more value than many sparrows."
(Matthew 10:29-31)
April 15th is
approaching. I go a-fishing.
No comments:
Post a Comment