When my lovely wife Darla and I had some plans derailed
recently, I was reminded of the words of Robert Burns: “The best laid schemes
of mice and men gang aft a-gley.” What he meant was, they get messed up. Take that verse, for example. Burns started off well: “The best
laid schemes of mice and men…” That phrase showed promise. We weren’t sure where he was going with it, but juxtaposing the mice with the men was enough to generate interest, and spin off a novel or two. Then his verse got sidetracked with gangs and gleys. I suppose his gang
reference shouldn’t surprise us; he wouldn’t be the first poet involved in gang
activity (Longfellow’s Gitche
Gumee Boys spring to mind). But what’s this business of afting a-gley? “The best laid schemes of mice and men gang
aft a-gley.”
I’ve concluded he intentionally messed up the line to prove
his point. The verse didn’t just pronounce that the best-laid schemes
tend to go awry, it demonstrated it, by going awry. It’s kind of
like onomatopoeia---you remember: the word used to identify the noise bees make
actually sounds like the noise bees make.
I think Burns was handing future
generations a fresh figure of speech---let’s
call it “gang-afting,” to add to metaphor,
simile, alliteration, personification, etc. (If you’ve ever had to create a Match the Figure of Speech to its Name Quiz for an English class, you know
that you can always use another figure of speech; if possible, you’d rather not
resort to the use of Metonymy and Synecdoche). Burns gifted us
with gang-afting: to start out with a good plan that gets royally
messed up. I suspect there are other examples
of it out there. We just didn’t know it because we weren’t looking for them,
and we wouldn’t have known what to call them if we’d seen them. I could do a search of English literature and
maybe come up with a few examples, but that would require time and effort, and
alter my normal pattern. However, any
reader who performs such a search will receive extra credit.
I’m
more curious about how Burns determined that the best-laid schemes of mice
go astray. We won’t give him any argument about men’s schemes, having watched a number of botched rocket launches
(which were presumably planned by rocket
scientists), but there seems to me to be no good reason to impugn the best-laid
plans of mice. Granted, some
schemes of mice go astray, unless those particular mice schemed to have
their backs suddenly broken while they nibbled on a tiny glob of peanut butter
or cheese. But I suspect that, among all
the schemes those mice may have entertained for that particular evening---chewing
into the box of rice in the pantry, eating the crumbs around the toaster, making
the humans jump and scream, encouraging the Mrs. to try to make more mice---the
plan to eat the food on that odd looking wooden contraption under the kitchen
sink was not among the “best laid.” I
would not want to be the reporter, interviewing the grieving mouse spouse on the following day, who suggested to her that the
unfortunate events of the previous evening were the results of her hubby’s
“best laid” scheme.
So
the question remains, how did Burns determine that the best-laid schemes of mice go astray? According to his poem, a mouse made his nest
in a field Burns subsequently plowed.
Clearly, that nesting scheme
went awry. But maybe nesting in that
particular field wasn’t that mouse’s best-laid
scheme.
I
know what Tommy Pretty Boy Humphrey would
say if I asked him:
“It’s
called poetic license, you Doofus. He
just said it because he liked the sound of it.
He didn’t expect you to take it literally.”
To
which I would answer: “And I suppose I should take literary advice from a guy whose
last completed book was Horton Hears a Who?”
“Don’t
knock it; it has drama, action and colorful illustrations, unlike a lot of
sermons I hear from You-know-who. And don’t spoil the ending for me.”
“Sorry---my
mistake. Then your last completed book must have been Horton
Hatches the Egg.”
“The
nice thing about Dr. Seuss books is they’re real
books, Rusty. As opposed, for example,
to what you call your Wry Bread book,
which is not really a book, but just
some electronic dots on a screen.”
“I
hate to break it to you Pretty Boy, but even the words in your hardback Horton
books are formed by dots on a page.”
“But
it’s a real page in a real book, written by a real doctor, not some fake pastor."
“I
don’t know what I was thinking when I let you into my story. I was trying to have an intelligent
conversation with my readers, using words like juxtaposing and onomatopoeia,
and now you and Horton have us completely off track. You’ve totally messed up everything.”
“You
mean you’ve been gang-afted.”
“It’s
like in Horton Hatches the Egg; Lazy Mayzie planned for Horton to sit on
her egg through the worst weather while she relaxed in Palm Beach, and she
expected to step in at the last moment and reclaim her egg as it was about to
hatch. But her plans gang-afted when the baby bird that hatched
looked just like a little Horton with wings.”
“Then
there’s the Grinch, of course. He planned
to destroy Christmas by stealing all the presents from Whoville, but his plan
was gang-afted when he heard the Whos
singing on Christmas morning, despite the missing presents."
“I
see. Have you found any examples of it
in your non-Seuss reading?”
“How
about Humpty Dumpty? Everything was going fine for him. He was sitting on a wall. Then his plan gang-afted, and the next thing he knew, he and his plans were in
pieces.”
“Let
me try to explain this in terms you can understand. Have you reached the point in your Humpty Dumpty reading at which the king’s
horses and men appear on the scene?”
“Yeah,
it’s been several days since I read the account, but as I recall, they couldn’t
put Humpty together again.”
“Well,
that’s how I feel about my story. Horton,
Humpty and Humphrey have left it in pieces on the ground, and there’s no way
anyone can put the thing back together.”
“If
it’s any consolation, Rusty, hardly anybody reads what you write. Now if you
threw in some action, some drama, some colorful illustrations and an occasional
Grinch…”
From
time to time, we all make plans that start out well, and then nosedive. But the Christian has the promise that “...all
things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called
according to His purpose.” (Romans 8:28) Even an
accident, a financial reversal, the loss of a job, a shocking diagnosis, or the
loss of a loved one does not come to the believer apart from the sovereign plans
of the one who “…works all things according to the counsel of His will.” (Ephesians
1:11)
Among
the more astounding things Jesus said to His disciples was this:
“Are not two sparrows sold
for a copper coin? And not one of them
falls to the ground apart from your Father’s will. But the very hairs of your head are numbered.
Do not fear; therefore, you are of more
value than many sparrows.” (Matthew 10:29-31)
What
an amazing declaration. A little bird so
insignificant to men that two of them could be bought with a copper coin, does
not fall to the ground apart from our
Father’s will? Jesus’ point was clearly
this: if even the creatures we consider
insignificant don’t live and move beyond God’s providential plan, then surely
God’s children, created in His image, redeemed through the sacrifice of His Son,
and of intense interest to the Lord, do not operate outside of God’s sovereign
oversight. This should give the believer
immense comfort.
It’s
true that, from our perspective, our best-laid plans may be ruined by something
as sudden as an ill-advised dash on Main Street, or an uncontrolled crash on Wall
Street, but from God’s perspective, all things are working together for our
ultimate good. Our plans may “gang aft
a-gley,” but God’s plans never could, and never will. That’s good news even for sparrows, mice, elephants,
Grinches, and egg-shaped people that sit on walls for no apparent reason.
I was toying with calling this, "The Grinch that Stole my Story." But I wasn't sure it would be clear that Pretty Boy was the Grinch.
ReplyDeletewow, its good to know that some things (people) never change. I just read this to Jeffiner (yes the entire thing) and it made us smile. Miss you Rusty and Darla K&J
ReplyDeleteGreat to hear from you, Ken. I enjoy seeing your Yellowstone pics on Facebook. By the way, has Jennifer become Jeffiner? I understand they can do that with hormone treatments now.
Delete